Blue Knight Detective Agency

Criminal Case Results

Home
Mission
Services
Advantages
Criminal Cases
Domestic Cases and GPS Tracking
Covert - Body Cameras
About Us
Support
Fees Schedule
Biographies of Owners
Contact Us
gavel.jpg
crimesintro.jpg
textfedcase.jpg
overhesad.jpg
fedcase01.jpg
pan.jpg

Here are the results from some other criminal cases.

 

 

MURDER -

INVESTIGATION SUMMARY: CLIENTS CHARGED WITH FIRST DEGREE MURDER WERE TWO COLLEGE STUDENTS WHO HAD BEEN ENGAGED IN AN ALTERCATION OUTSIDE OF A STRIP BAR AFTER HOURS. FIVE BOUNCERS WERE INVOLVED ALONG WITH A NUMBER OF OTHER PATRONS, ONE OF THE ACCUSED HAD BEEN INJURED AND HE AND HIS COMPANION LEFT AND WENT TO A LOCAL HOSPITAL. AFTER THE FIGHTING HAD STOPPED, THERE WAS ONE DECEASED VICTIM LYING IN THE PARKING LOT. THE BOUNCERS SELECTED THE TWO COLLEGE STUDENTS AS THE OFFENDERS. THEY WERE ARRESTED AND CHARGED. OUR INVESTIGATION INDICATED THAT ONE OR MORE OF THE BOUNCERS WERE MORE LIKELY TO HAVE BEEN THE ACTUAL OFFENDER. A PHOTO ARRAY OF SUBJECTS INCLUDING THE COLLEGE STUDENTS WAS USED WITH ONE OF THE KEY ACCUSERS, ONE OF THE BOUNCERS. HE FAILED TO IDENTIFY THE COLLEGE STUDENTS. THIS INVESTIGATIVE REPORT WAS USED TO IMPEACH THE WITNESS DURING TRIAL.

RESULTS: CASE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE FOR BOTH DEFENDANTS

CRIMINAL SEXUAL ASSAULT-

INVESTIGATION SUMMARY: CLIENT CHARGED WITH HAVING SEXUAL INTERCOURSE WITH JUVENILE NIECE AT 7:00 AM IN A ROOM THAT HAD AT LEAST TEN OTHER OCCUPANTS, VICTIM CLAIMED THAT SHE MADE NO OUTCRY DUE TO FEAR. CLIENT INITIALLY DENIED ANY CONTACT WITH VICTIM . INTERVIEWS WITH VICTIM AND OTHERS PRESENT AT SCENE ALONG WITH FORENSIC EVIDENCE MADE IT CLEAR THAT INTERCOURSE THOUGH CONSENSUAL TOOK PLACE.RESULTS: CLIENT ACCEPTED PLEA BARGAIN ON LENGTH OF SENTENCE AS BEST ALTERNATIVE TO TRIAL.


MURDER-

INVESTIGATION SUMMARY: A LOCAL DRUG DEALER AND TWO ASSOCIATES ARE ROBBED OF DRUGS AND MONEY LATE ON A THURSDAY NIGHT BY INDIVIDUAL "A". AT 7:00 AM ON FRIDAY MORNING AT THE HOME OF THE ALLEGED ROBBER, THREE INDIVIDUALS KNOCK ON THE DOOR AND OPEN FIRE ON THE PERSON "B" WHO ANSWERS. INDIVIDUAL "A" IDENTIFIES THE LOCAL DRUG DEALER AND HIS TWO ASSOCIATES. IN ADDITION POLICE HAVE THE LIVE-IN GIRL FRIEND OF ONE OF HIS ASSOCIATES GIVE A STATEMENT THAT SHE SAW THE THREE DEFENDANTS

LEAVE HER APARTMENT WITH GUNS ON THE MORNING OF THE MURDER.

OUR INVESTIGATION UNCOVERS A LOCAL WOMAN WHO WAS WALKING HER DOG IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD WHO WITNESSED THE SHOOTING AND

PLACES THE THREE DEFENDANTS IN A PARKED CAR AT THE TIME THAT THREE OTHER INDIVIDUALS SHOT THE VICTIM. FURTHER THIS INVESTIGATOR GETS THE PRIMARY ACCUSER "A" ON VIDEO TAPE DEMONSTRATING THAT HE WAS IN NO POSITION TO VIEW THE SHOOTING AS HE WAS HIDING WHEN THE SHOOTING TOOK PLACE. LASTLY THE

LIVE-IN GIRLFRIEND RECANTS HER TESTIMONY STATING THAT SHE ONLY TOLD ABOUT WEAPONS BECAUSE SHE WAS THREATENED BY A POLICE OFFICER.

RESULTS: STATE DROPPED ALL CHARGES AGAINST ALL THREE DEFENDANTS


ARMED ROBBERY-

INVESTIGATION SUMMARY: CLIENT CHARGED WITH ARMED ROBBERY BASED ON VICTIM IDENTIFICATION MADE SEVERAL DAYS AFTER A ROBBERY. OUR INVESTIGATION GENERATED A STATEMENT FROM

A PASSENGER IN THE VICTIM'S VEHICLE THAT REFUTED THE ID.

RESULTS: CASE DISMISSED.